Publisher: Addison-Wesley, 2011, 413 pages
ISBN: 978-0-321-71247-9
Keywords: Management
In many organizations, management is the biggest obstacle to successful Agile development. Unfortunately, reliable guidance on Agile management has been scarce indeed. Now, leading Agile manager Jurgen Appelo fills that gap, introducing a realistic approach to leading, managing, and growing your Agile team or organization.
Writing for current managers and developers moving into management, Appelo shares insights that are grounded in modern complex systems theory, reflecting the intense complexity of modern software development. Appelo's Management 3.0 model recognizes that today's organizations are living, networked systems; and that management is primarily about people and relationships.
Management 3.0 doesn't offer mere checklists or prescriptions to follow slavishly; rather, it deepens your understanding of how organizations and Agile teams work and gives you tools to solve your own problems. Drawing on his extensive experience as an Agile manager, the author identifies the most important practices of Agile management and helps you improve each of them.
Coverage includes
Thoroughly pragmatic — and never trendy — Jurgen Appelo's Management 3.0 helps you bring greater agility to any software organization, team, or project.
You get suspicious when the book starts with 3 pages of praise for the book. from people you've never heard of. Then a lot of self-grandification of the author and explaining why he is so smart and young (it will later be shown that he has very little experience). Then some bold claims why he has revolutionized the management concept (including making some dubious claims to differentiate the line and project management roles).
He then goes on about complexity theory et al, which is stuff any aspiring MBA learns about (in fact, the whole book feels like a tentative try to create a 101 book for a bachelor management course, including casting doubt on all previous approaches (with very flimsy understanding of them).
The carries on with anecdotes and references (probably to make it look "scientific") but the text are naive and the conclusions are either obvious or not supported by the underlying material. In fact, it feels more like a university X-paper that hasn't been reviewed…
You can miss this book without missing anything meaningful.
Comments
There are currently no comments
New Comment